http://wane.com/2017/01/10/new-ohio-law-adds-baby-box-language/
Governor Kasich
has signed Senate Bill 332 which allows parents of children who are not older
than 30 days to be delivered to a newborn safety incubator. The reason for
signing this Bill is to ultimately lower Ohio's infant mortality rate. The idea
for these "baby boxes" came from Safe
Haven Baby Boxes, which is a
non-profit organization in Indiana. This law that was recently signed in Ohio
will have specific regulations created by the health department for the safety
incubators. As of now, there are two "baby boxes" installed at fire
stations in two different cities in Indiana. The main purpose for these
"baby boxes" is that parents can be anonymous and feel safe about
dropping off an unwanted child. Monica Kelsey, who is the founder of Safe Haven Baby Boxes, stated:“We’re excited that Ohio has allowed us to
bring these boxes into Ohio. They’re doing the policies, protocols and
procedures we wanted Indiana to do and we’re working directly with them."
She also stated, “I’m hoping this educates all of us and that the
policies, protocols and procedures that Ohio comes up with, maybe Indiana can
adopt as well. This was never about putting boxes in buildings. It’s about
saving abandoned babies.”
However, there has been some controversy surrounding the idea of
the "baby boxes." First being, that they are not covered by Safe
Haven Law because it requires a person-to-person transfer of the child. Others
are saying that having the boxes at a fire station with an emergency first
responder takes care of that issue. Before this Bill was passed in Ohio, Monica
Kelsey worked with the state to call the "baby boxes" "newborn
safety incubators" instead. There is a challenge in determining what would
be appropriate for these "baby boxes", considering child welfare laws
vary from state to state. Currently in Indiana, they are being tested at the fire-stations. When a baby is dropped off, a dispatch alarm is
sounded where a responder would immediately be directed to the "baby
box." Ohio does have new sections written that pertain to this law so that
appropriate regulations can be enforced. As of now, neither "baby
box" has been used as they are still being tested for safety and
performance. There are still standards waiting to be approved as well for the
efficiency of the "baby boxes."
This story has
struck me in a couple of different ways. The first being, that infant mortality
is a serious issue in our state that needs to be resolved in some way. Seeing
this is encouraging because there is some initiative being taken to reduce this
rate. However, I personally feel hesitant to "jump on board" with the
newborn safety incubators. The idea and heart behind it is good, but as a
social worker and just a person in society, I feel concerned for the safety and
well-being of the child. With that being said, it's not completely fair to
judge the idea yet, because there is still much to be determined in how these
incubators will function and what the protocols will be when someone actually
uses it.
I also see this
story and think about the parent(s) that are dropping off babies for whatever
reasons they might have. Yes, I want the children to take priority and I want
them to be safe. However, I have concerns for the parents. Knowing what led up
to this decision can be one more thing that can be used to eradicate the issue
of infant mortality. I recognize the intention of anonymity, but as a social
worker, I think it is important to address the root of this issue.
P.S. This is the
link to Safe Haven Baby Boxes if
anyone wants to look at it.
http://www.safehavenbabyboxes.com/home.html
I think this concept of the "baby box" is good in theory but not sure how well it would work in practice. I think being able to anonymously drop off an unwanted child is great instead of that parent abusing the unwanted child or even killing it. I also agree that as a social worker we need to get to the root of the issue. Maybe we could figure out, for those who do not want children, how to stop unwanted pregnancies to occur to ultimately stop abandoning or abusing the child once they are born.
ReplyDeleteI like your take (and Haley's) on getting to the root of the problem. This idea is similar to my blog posting, which is about providing early intervention/prevention to eradicate the need for foster care. I intern at a private adoption agency and even though we are able to provide safe, loving homes for the children we place, which also gives a wonderful gift to a family wanting to raise a child, we recognize the importance of empowering the birth family to address the issues that led to the decision to place their child for adoption. Unfortunately, we often cannot provide the resources they need directly, but we do what we can to link to other services and provide support and education. That is one of the tricky parts of the baby box idea- the anonymity does not allow to address the needs of the parent(s). I will be keeping an eye out for further news on this topic, as well!
ReplyDeleteI think this idea is good in working towards addressing the issue of infant mortality and abuse/neglect. I agree that there are many other factors that need to be addressed and more information I would want to know before I would agree or disagree with this idea, however I do like to see people thinking and acting on change that they wish to see happen.
ReplyDelete